How Nexperia Crisis Exposed Europe’s Power Gap - Part 2

In Part 1, I documented how the Dutch seizure of Nexperia on September 30, 2025 froze global automotive supply chains. This second chapter traces how a U.S. China trade truce fundamentally reshaped the crisis and left Europe sidelined in its own industrial standoff.

Executive Summary: November 2025 Developments

Why November 2025 Mattered

The Paradox:
Geopolitical de-escalation (U.S. – China deal) happened simultaneously with corporate escalation (Nexperia B.V. vs. Nexperia China operations). The result: a diplomatic breakthrough that exposed European leverage erosion.

The Stakes:

• Majority of Nexperia’s Component cost: $0.06–$0.75 per unit

• Daily production risk: €30 million for Volkswagen alone for just Golf Production Stop

• Affected workers: Thousands on government subsidized short time work

• Market share at risk: 40% of global discrete transistors/diodes

• Frozen capacity: 70 – 80% in mainland China

The Lesson:
When Washington and Beijing negotiate semiconductor supply chains, European sovereignty becomes a secondary consideration, even when European automakers bear the primary cost.

The Trump–Xi Deal: A Trade That Sidelined Europe

Three weeks ago, I documented how the Dutch government's seizure of Nexperia froze global automotive supply chains. What I didn't anticipate was how quickly the crisis would shift from a European sovereignty play to a bargaining chip in U.S.–China negotiations.

In early November, Presidents Trump and Xi met in the Republic of Korea and struck a bilateral agreement that fundamentally altered the Nexperia equation.

The U.S. Concession:
Suspended implementation of the "50% Ownership Rule" for one year, starting November 10, 2025. This was the exact regulation, a day after which, Netherlands acted and seized the offices of Nexperia on September 30.

China's Commitment:
Resumed chip exports from Nexperia's Chinese facilities, allowing "partial flow" to prevent worst case automotive production collapse.

The Result:
The timing created an impossible situation for Europe. The Netherlands had acted on September 30, one day after U.S. imposed new export controls, which caught Nexperia because of its majority ownership from the black listed Wingtech Technology, citing national security concerns. Now, the U.S. and China negotiated a bilateral deal that suspended the very export control rule whose timing coincided with the Dutch seizure. Europe found itself in a lose - lose position: maintain the seizure while Washington and Beijing negotiate around them, or back down and admit the action achieved nothing. Either way, the leverage was gone.

The Cost of a Frozen Supply Chain: Pennies That Halt Production Lines

To understand why Germany was particularly vulnerable, we need to look at what was actually frozen.

What Nexperia Makes:
Discrete semiconductors, MOSFETs, diodes, transistors etc. These aren't cutting edge processors. They're mostly "legacy" chips that cost $0.06–$0.75 per unit.

Where They're Used:
Every vehicle application you can think of, power management (battery systems, DC-DC converters, On Board Chargers), safety systems (ABS, ESP, airbags), ADAS sensors (LiDAR and radar control circuits), body electronics (lighting, HVAC) and infotainment systems.

The Scale of Dependence:

• Nexperia's position: 40% global market share in discrete transistors/diodes

• Annual volume: 110 billion units shipped

• Critical bottleneck: 70–80% of assembly/test capacity in China (Dongguan, Guangdong)

The Financial Stakes:

Each component costs cents, but a missing $0.6 component can halt production of a €30,000 - 40,000 vehicle. Volkswagen's Golf line produces roughly 1,000 vehicles per working day in 2025 i.e. 250,000 were planned in 2025. At an average selling price of ~€30,000. Each day of just Golf’s production stoppage represents €30 million in lost potential revenue for VW alone.

Germany's Production Halts: The Real-World Casualties

Between October 29 and November 6, the warnings became reality. Here's who got hit:

Bosch (Major Tier-1 Supplier):

• Applied for Kurzarbeit at three factories

• Braga, Portugal: 2,500 of 3,300 employees affected

• Ansbach & Salzgitter, Germany: 650–950 employees on reduced hours from a total of 3800 employees

Nissan Motor:

• Cut Rogue SUV production by ~900 vehicles in Japan (week of November 10)

• Reviewed further output reductions for following week

Volkswagen:

• Warned of potential stoppages for Golf and Tiguan lines at Wolfsburg

• Cannot rule out short-term production impacts

ZF Friedrichshafen:

• Prepared Kurzarbeit applications at multiple German locations

Six Additional Companies in Baden-Württemberg:

• Applied for short-time work subsidies due to semiconductor bottlenecks

The pattern: The Netherlands acted to protect European interests, but German industry absorbed the immediate cost.

The Corporate Civil War Inside Nexperia

While diplomats negotiated, the corporate structure fractured in spectacular fashion.

October 29, 2025:
Nexperia B.V. (Dutch headquarters) suspended wafer supply to Chinese facilities after the China entities stopped making payments.

November 5, 2025:
Nexperia B.V. publicly accused its China operations of:

• Ignoring lawful corporate instructions

• Misappropriating corporate seals

• Directing customers to remit payments to unauthorized accounts

• Sending false information to stakeholders

The Authenticity Warning:
Most critically, Nexperia B.V. stated it cannot guarantee the intellectual property, technology, authenticity, or quality standards for products delivered from China as of October 13, 2025.

This was the lowest point in this saga, a company publicly questioning the legitimacy of products bearing its own brand.

China's Counter-Move:
According to reports, Nexperia China began sourcing wafers from WingSkySemi (company owned by Ex-Nexperia CEO and CEO of Wingtech Technology, which was among the primary reason for Nexperia’s seizure in Netherlands). The Chinese unit effectively defied the seizure and resumed operations independently.

Europe's Calculated Retreat

By November 6, Minister Karremans signaled readiness to suspend government powers and revoke the ministerial order, potentially within days.

The Stated Conditions:

1. Verification that chip supplies are resuming to customers

2. Resolution of financial disputes between Dutch and Chinese entities

The Reality:
Neither condition is fully met. Yet the Netherlands is planning to back down anyway.

Why Europe is Looking to Yield:

Limited Leverage: China controls 70–80% of Nexperia's backend capacity and can redirect production to sister companies (WingSkySemi).

U.S. – China Primacy: When Washington and Beijing negotiate, European interests become secondary considerations.

Self-Inflicted Damage: The seizure hurt German automakers more than it hurt Wingtech, which retained control of production assets.

What I Heard From Industry Leaders

In September, I attended a panel talk with the CEOs of BMW and Siemens at IAA. When asked about U.S. tariffs and geopolitical tensions, both were remarkably candid and accepted that Europe has no leverage anymore when navigating between Europe, China, and the U.S.

Check out these 3 minute snippet, where they have explained the Europe’s situation.
If twitter video, posted below, doesn’t work. Here is a Linkedin Link as well.

The Long-Term Damage

The Nexperia crisis isn't over. It's entering a more dangerous phase.

For Chinese Companies:
The precedent is set. A European government can seize your operations overnight using Cold War era legislation based on third country regulations. How to navigate the future without risking further incidents like this?

For European Industrial Policy:
The semiconductor crisis Germany needed arrived as a self-inflicted wound that damaged the automakers it should protect.

For China:
Beijing demonstrated it can weaponize even "low-tech" supply chains with devastating effect. The message: Europe's industrial base depends on Chinese backend capacity and China will use it.

My Take: The Cost of Borrowed Sovereignty

The Netherlands invoked the Goods Availability Act claiming to protect European technological sovereignty.

In reality, it demonstrated the opposite: Europe's room for independent action in tech disputes is constrained by U.S. policy objectives and Chinese supply chain dominance.

Three Takeaways

1. Chinese OEM Expansion might Slow: Trust has eroded. Why risk billions if assets can be nationalized overnight?

2. Germany Needs Alternative and Resilient Supply Chains: EU Chips Act funding is too slow to close the gap. EU needs to build resilient supply chains.

3. The "European Tech Stack" Is an Illusion
   "European technology sovereignty" is rhetorical when:

• Front-end production (Germany) is separated from backend materials (China) by 7,000 km

• U.S. export controls dictate European regulatory action

• China controls the chokepoints

The Bottom Line:

A €28 million daily production risk for Volkswagen.
Thousands of workers on short-time subsidies.
A diplomatic solution brokered without European input.

All because of a $0.5 MOSFET.

Europe did not just lose the technology war in 2025.
It lost the leverage to fight one on its own terms.

What's Your Take?

For industry leaders:
Does this crisis change your assessment of supply chain diversification timelines?

For policy observers:
Can Europe develop meaningful leverage in tech disputes without controlling more of the supply chain?

For Chinese manufacturers:
Does the Nexperia precedent make European expansion prohibitively risky?

Share your perspective in the comments. The semiconductor wars are just beginning, and the Nexperia crisis offers a preview of battles to come.

Sources:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 

Also kindly share if you liked this Newsletter. This will help me to improve.

Thanks and till next week,
Haseeb